Tuesday, February 13, 2018

Day 331: Enterprise, Carpenter Street




Show: Star Trek; Enterprise
Episode Particulars: S3EP11, “Carpenter Street”

 Summary: Archer gets a late night visit from Daniels, who informs him that his Temporal agency has spotted three Xindi in 2004 Detroit. He gives Archer some tech to transport anything that doesn’t belong there back to the 22nd century, then sends Archer and T’Pol into the past. Some investigating quickly reveals that a man named Loomis (Leland Orser) has been kidnapping people and bringing them to a warehouse on the titular Carpenter Street. Naturally, there’s only one way to get to the bottom of this; go undercover.


Standalone Thoughts: To be honest, for all I’ve been eager for this arc to get more Xindi-centric, this episode doesn’t do much for me despite granting my wish. That being said, there’s plenty to talk about here, so maybe I’ll be able to figure out why along the way.

To start with, the teaser is interesting. There’s a long stretch when we’re just watching Loomis return and settle into his rat-trap apartment, before he finally gets a phone call from what turns out to be a Xindi. It goes on long enough that I wonder if audiences watching it as it aired were confused and wondering if they were on the wrong channel, or if they realized immediately that we were dealing with a time travel/Temporal Cold War episode. I feel like it goes on a touch too long for the introduction of the sci-fi elements to make a proper impact, but at least it makes the teaser stand out, rather than some of the stuff we were getting in Season One.

Next, we have the exchange between Archer and Daniels, which also doesn’t necessarily work the way it should. When you get right down to it, the conversation basically consists of Archer saying “Can you help me or at least explain what’s going on?” and Daniels responding “I’m as confused as you are.” The intent may have been to suggest to the audience that this whole Xindi conflict was part of a much larger thing we’re only getting hints of, but in practice, it’s confusing, annoying, and more than a little convenient for the writers so they don’t have to explain anything. I’m kind of sensing the hand of Admiral Plot Device here…

The third and fourth points are kind of related; the time travel aspect has a different vibe than most of the Trek episodes that deal with that subject, and Archer and T’Pol (Archer especially) don’t always behave like good guys. In my experience with Star Trek time travel episodes, they’re either comedic (generally due to culture clash), or have a heavy sci-fi element (paradoxes, changing history, going to a point that’s still in our future, etc.). Here, while tricorders, communicators, and phase pistols are used, and the Xindi are clearly using future tech, it’s not the primary focus of the episode. In fact, get rid of the Xindi makeup and tone down the technology a little, and this could very easily be a normal police drama, or at least believable as an episode of 24. About the only thing that’s similar to other time travel stories is the various discussions about how different the past was, and it’s generally said by T’Pol in a disapproving way, which leads to it feeling somewhat preachy (perhaps that’s part of my problem with it). Of course, she’s one to talk—over the course of the episode, she and Archer steal a car, steal money from an ATM, break into an apartment, and rough up a suspect. It’s in keeping with the police drama tone and the whole “how far will Archer go to save Earth” theme, but it just doesn’t feel believable to me. Sure, we’ve seen Archer willing to resort to less savory methods already in this arc, but he’s barely in 2004 for two minutes and the first thing we really see him do is look for a car to break into. More acknowledgement that he was aware of his bad behavior might have helped here.

After thinking everything over, I guess the reason this episode doesn’t work for me is that it kind of feels like it’s trying to be something it’s not. “North Star” was reveling in the old Western tropes while adding sci-fi elements, while this episode seems more interested in the police drama aspects than the sci-fi aspects. Add in the hints of preachiness, and the result is an episode that moves things forward, but doesn’t necessarily go about it in the most entertaining manner. Naturally, your opinion may differ on this, especially if you like police dramas and the tropes associated with them, but from my perspective, the execution left a lot to be desired.

How it Relates to the Whole: The ending of this episode alone implies that there’s going to be a followup in the next episode, though there’s no guarantee of that. Even so, we’re finally getting more of the plot thread introduced in “Rajiin” and the Temporal Cold War makes a reappearance. I think we can safely say this episode is arc relevant.

Other: *I’m willing to bet that Loomis was named after the character from Halloween. Though I’m not sure if I can figure out a specific reason for that choice off the top of my head. Then again, I’ve never been much for horror movies.

*During the scene where Archer and T’Pol interrogate Loomis, the camera dips sharply, giving off a handheld vibe. It wasn’t noticeable in any other shots, so I’m guessing it was deliberate. I’m just not sure if it was meant to be aping the filming techniques that were popular in the early 2000’s or if they thought it was appropriate to the scene. All I know for sure it’s that it’s slightly distracting, but not in an immersion breaking way.

Badass Malcolm Moment: We’ve got another episode where the majority of the characters don’t appear, but at least we get to hear Malcolm’s voice over the communicator. And when we do hear him, it’s clear he’s going to do what was asked of him, no questions asked. Admittedly, that can also be a bad thing, but it suggests he trusts Archer’s judgment and knew his Captain’s tone of voice made it clear that this was serious and needed to be tended to immediately. Which is probably something all good military men learn how to judge.

(Ok, this isn’t my best effort, but give me a break; I had five seconds to work with here.)

After the Fact Update: Sure enough, the name Loomis is indeed a reference to Halloween, and there are apparently other references scattered in there as well (including in the title, as Halloween’s director was John Carpenter). However, the reason for paying so much homage to Halloween is still not explained.

No comments:

Post a Comment