Show: Agatha Christie’s Poirot
Episode
Particulars: S1EP7, “Problem at Sea”, original airdate February 19th,
1989.
Standalone Thoughts:
I’ve said before that continuity doesn’t matter so much in Poirot, especially early Poirot, but watching the episodes in
order does occasionally lead to a feeling that they should have been at least a
little consistent. In “Triangle at
Rhodes”, Poirot was on holiday in, well, Rhodes, Greece. In today’s episode, he
and Hastings are on a cruise that stops at Alexandria, Egypt. A quick check of
Google Maps confirms that these two cities are relatively close to each other
(about four hours by plane, though probably a day or two by boat). So either
Poirot went to Rhodes on vacation and met up with Hastings to continue the
vacation with him (unlikely, as “Triangle at Rhodes” says Hastings has gone
shooting and it sounds like Poirot’s heading back to England once his
vacation’s over), or he went to Rhodes, went back to England…and then he and
Hastings went on this cruise. I know we should probably assume that time has
passed, but it’s hard not to notice things like that when you’re watching them
in quick succession, especially when you’re used to more continuity heavy TV
shows.
Even leaving the timing aside, I’m kind of at a loss for
who this cruise is for. There are several single women on board, but a lot of
the men appear to have been in the military, which is made all the more blatant
when Hastings talks to one of the crew and points out that “we’re all civilians
now”. There was something about the conversation that made me feel this was
some sort of veteran’s cruise, but that doesn’t seem to be the case. All I know
for sure is that the military and previous wars come up several times, but it
never actually contributes to the plot. Very bizarre, to be sure.
Speaking of the characters, while we’re once again given
a large cast of characters who interact with each other, this time the episode
goes too far and has way too many characters. They’re introduced so rapid fire
that it’s hard to keep everyone straight at first, and most of them only serve
a small purpose in the narrative but are otherwise pointless (one couple, the
Tollivers, don’t seem to have any reason for being there other than to be a
target of ire for Mrs. Clapperton, which was unnecessary). Furthermore, almost
none of them make a good first impression, to the point where I felt like
Poirot’s pleasantries to his fellow travellers were getting increasingly
sarcastic as the establishing scenes went on. That being said, Shelia Matthews’
performance as Mrs. Clapperton was perfect, in that she had me hating her
almost from the get-go and gave a very good reason for why someone would want
her dead. And most of the important characters soften up as we go along, so at
least the episode isn’t a chore to watch. It can come a little close at the
beginning, though.
As for the mystery part of the plot…it’s ok. The murder
once again is discovered at the thirty minute mark, which doesn’t leave a lot
of time to solve the case. We do get some questioning of the passengers, though
not everybody and not for very long. Hastings actually gets to be more than
just a bit of comic relief and helps advance the plot a little by noticing,
following, and stopping a suspicious character, which is always a good thing. I
am, however, disappointed that we came right up to the edge of having a proper
“grand reveal” scene, but were denied it. It kind of relates to the rest of my
feelings about the series in general; they keep getting close to the mysteries
I remember, but don’t quite pull it off. Maybe I’ll have to wait until the next
season…?
Number of Tropes
Followed/Subverted: Only 2/15 definite tropes today, and no subversions.
While it’s not too blatant, there’s at least a little “Ambiguous Foreigners” at
play, and I’d say the episode mostly follows “Playing Fair”. And in the
interest of fairness, I’ll mention that there are three tropes I’m uncertain
about as well. “Stopped Clocks are Wrong” kind of comes up, but it’s
acknowledged in the episode that it’s hard to establish the time of death
thanks to the heat, plus the “doctor” is a sailor with minimal experience, so
it doesn’t necessarily play a large role in the case. And while it’s not
essential to the plot, there are scattered suggestions of “Suspects in Love”,
enough that I thought it should at least somewhat apply. You could also argue
there’s some “Actors Insulting Themselves” if you stretch it, but it’s not as
blatant as other episodes have been, so I’m not sure how to classify that one.
Other: *While
Hastings is back, Japp and Lemon still haven’t returned yet. It’s not an issue,
it just seems weird that they’d be left out for two episodes in a row. I guess
the Brits feel less of a need to include their main cast in every episode than
the Americans do. Not that I think that’s a problem, mind.
*There’s an absolutely baffling line when General Forbes (Roger
Hume) suggests Miss Henderson (Anne Firbank) take some exercise, and she
responds “My religion forbids it at this time of year”, which General Forbes
seems to accept with stunned understanding. Was that a euphemism for
menstruation or something? If it is, I don’t think it’s a very good one.
*I have to admit, this…
…is kind of awesome. A walking stick with a built-in
telescope is a neat idea, though I have no idea how practical it would be in
real life. Great visual, though.
*Another odd line in the episode is when Poirot asks
Hastings if he thinks women can’t be murderers. Hastings responds “Ladies don’t
get found out.” Not only is that demonstrably untrue (there are several female
murderers in this show), but I cannot decide if that line’s supposed to be pro
or anti woman. Let’s just chalk it up to Hastings being well-meaning but
oblivious and move on.
*On the one hand, this is one of the prettiest shots in
the whole episode;
On the other, it’s clearly fake. The starry sky looks too
unreal, and the moon is lined up with the town too perfectly. It’s great work
by the artists, but it threw me out of the story immediately.
Most Interesting
Character: As I said, none of the characters came off well initially, and
although some improved, the one I think I consistently liked the most was;
Ellie Henderson
She’s nice, polite, a reader (she’s almost always
carrying a book), and seems comfortable travelling alone, all of which are good
qualities for anyone to have. She may not play a large role in the plot, but at
least she leaves an overall positive impression. Which is more than you can say
for some of the characters.
In the middle of this episode, I suddenly had a thought about the series as a whole. The series is VERY different from the stories and I started to think about the differences.
ReplyDeleteThe stories were set in the "present" not a past so there was no question of writing a period piece. Readers would have been familiar with the world depicted. The emphasis was on a carefully spun mystery which needed to both intrigue and entertain. Characters tended to be one-dimensional - plot (with a touch of atmosphere where needed) was king.
The producers of the Poriot series had a big choice to make. What kind of show would it be? Would it be a mystery that happened to be set in the past, or was it a period piece with mysteries as the hook?
So I watched this episode switching between two different frames: mystery and period piece. As a mystery, it was not very good - in fact, I suspected the killer was doing ventriloquism even before we knew who was going to get murdered. As a mystery, things like Hastings seeing the cabin attendant with the eyepatch(! - now THAT'S not suspicious is it) slinking off furtively, promting the Captain to set down his sherry and follow the guy looking furtive into a shady Alexandria bar after passing the exotic hookers on the way. Really? Just how non-serious is all that as a mystery?
On the other hand, the very same scene plays very well as a period piece evoking memories of a time that actually never existed except in the British imaginations of the 30's. In fact, the actual period of the Poirot shows is NOT Britain of the inter-war years, but an imagined Britain. Much like the frothy comedies of the 30's weren't of an actual America but an imagined America of fabulously wealthy beautiful people without a care or a nation of hobos and "forgotten men" with not very much in-between.
The imagined world of Poirot is filled with Art Deco touches and rich people and honest tradesmen and exotic "furriners." That makes Poirot an exotic specimen himself, especially when set aside the dependable common-sensical Captain Hastings.
I started to measure the episode in those terms; how successfully did it evoke a time that never existed expect in the collective imagination? It did it quite well - from the two biddies singing slightly riske songs about the Army, to the major reciting Kipling, to the exotic Egyptians (complete with hawkers trying to sell fake antiques), to the ever so superior murder victim, even to the style and look of the cruise ship/yacht.
So today I said who cares about the plot, let me sail away with Britannia into the last rays of sunlight illuminating the most far flung empire in history.
It was very tasty, but not very filling.
That's a really interesting perspective, and another possible way to watch the show and enjoy it (Though it feels slightly absurd to say "just shut your brain off and enjoy the pretty" for a mystery). It does sound like you and I had similar feelings for this one, right down to guessing almost immediately what the bad guy was doing. This one was probably my second favorite of the season, and atmosphere probably did play a part in it. "Tasty but not very filling" seems to describe it just fine.
Delete