Show: Star Trek; Deep Space Nine
Episode
Particulars: S3EP12, “Past Tense, Part 2”
Standalone
Thoughts: Part Two is definitely better than Part One, but only slightly.
There’s still a fair bit of preaching, but at least Sisko and Bashir get to do
more than just rant about the injustice of it all. We get some decent bits of
tension during the various confrontations between Sisko, B.C., and the
hostages, and the more conversational scenes between characters feel natural and
relatively pleasant, given the circumstances. It’s not enough to redeem the
episode, but it’s the spoonful of sugar that helps the medicine go down. And
that’s honestly all I can think to say on the matter.
How it Relates to
the Whole: Like I said in Part One, this episode has basically no long-term
effects. Let’s just move on and try to ignore it.
Other: *One of
the interesting things about watching an older show is spotting elements that
date the material. When you throw sci-fi into the mix, it gets even more
interesting, because you can compare the futures they show to the way things
have actually been turning out. In this particular case, the characters
constantly throw out references to “the web” and there’s even one mention of
e-mail. Given that the internet had only just become mainstream in 1993, I’m
kind of impressed that they managed to incorporate it into the show. I’m
further impressed by the fact that, while they got some details wrong, the
writers did kind of predict that the internet would not only be a big part of
our lives, but also that something along the lines of Skype would eventually
exist. Not bad, all things considered.
*While Sisko, Bashir, and Dax are dealing with the main
plot, we occasionally cut back to O’Brien, Kira, and Odo trying to find and
rescue them. Due to technobabble plot devices, they only have a limited number
of tries to rescue their friends, and of course, it all comes down to one last
attempt, and three time periods to choose from. O’Brien picks one at random, saying
it’s his “best guess”, and he turns out to be right. I’m guessing the intent
was to build some tension, but in reality, it just comes off as a Deus Ex Machina. I would have much
preferred O’Brien to narrow it down through logic, which would have been much
more clever.
*Back in Part One, Sisko and Bashir had their comm badges
stolen by unknown people. They never do manage to get them back, and yet nobody
ever mentions this. There is at least one person walking around in 2024 with
future tech, but nobody seems concerned about it. Given that this sort of thing
is often a major deal in other Star Trek episodes,
it seems like an odd oversight here. Clearly, though, the loss of the badges
didn’t pollute the timeline, so I’ll just have to speculate what, if anything,
happened to them. Maybe they became a brief fashion trend.
Best
Line/Exchange: The episode is slightly less preachy than Part One, but
there’s still not a lot to choose from. So I ended up with;
(Sisko is trying to
prevent B.C. from shooting a hostage)
B.C.: I thought
we were on the same side here!
Sisko: We are.
But you get on my nerves, and I don’t like your hat! Now put the gun down!
There is some context for this—B.C. had been asking Sisko
if he thought the brim of B.C.’s fedora looked better raised or lowered—but it
seems like such an innocuous insult to throw out in the midst of a crisis that
it winds up adding a note of humor to the situation. Given the nature of this
episode, I need all the humor I can get.
After the Fact
Update: Alexander Siddig considers these episodes to be “The end of the old
Bashir and the beginning of the new, more responsible Bashir […] Bashir proved
to everyone and himself that he can handle very tricky situations with almost
no backup and no gizmos, not even a shotgun like Sisko had. It became
conceivable that Bashir would be your first or second choice on an away team if
you were going on a combat mission. I think that they were a renaissance pair
of shows for Bashir.” While I don’t want to question Siddig on this (after all,
he understands Bashir way better than I do), I do disagree with him on two
points. First, while I won’t deny that Bashir handled himself well here, that
doesn’t prove that he’d be good in a combat situation except in the role of
medic; sure, he can talk people down, but when fighting breaks out, will he be
able to defend himself? But secondly, I think “the beginning of the new, more
responsible Bashir” started a lot earlier than this episode. Sure, it’s been
mixed in with awkwardness, but the groundwork was being laid long before now.
Give yourself a little credit, Siddig—you were bringing Bashir’s maturity to
the table long before the writers decided to make it official.
No comments:
Post a Comment