Show: Columbo
Episode
Particulars: S10EP13, “Murder With Too Many Notes”, original airdate March
12th, 2001.
Standalone
Thoughts: My opinion on this episode hasn’t changed since I saw it for the
first time years ago; this is the Columbo
episode with the most egregious padding. It seems like almost every
interaction between Columbo and Crawford eventually involves a digression that
serves no purpose, other than to talk about music. And when they’re clearly supposed to be relevant to the case,
like Columbo finding an excuse to get into Crawford’s car and ask him some
questions, the time it takes to get to that point, followed by the lack of
payoff (which in this case would be a statement that made Crawford nervous),
makes it feel pointless even when it’s not. To make matters worse, these music
scenes sometimes don’t even make sense in context. For example, if Crawford is
supposedly shaken by McEnery’s death, why would he play Tchaikovsky and spend a
good thirty seconds enthusiastically conducting along to it, before eventually
singing “Camptown Races” with Columbo? If that was a clue to Columbo that
Crawford wasn’t actually all that broken up about McEnery’s death, that would
be one thing, but the incident passes without any comment. Later, Crawford
spends what has to be two minutes discussing the use of music in movies, using
some classic movie themes that have nothing to do with the case (and honestly
kind of undermines his point that great movie music isn’t noticeable). You can
try to argue that this is a lead-in to him playing music from the concert that
helps to point Columbo in the right direction, but my response is “Why would
Crawford play that piece to prove his point when we were told earlier that the
piece is from a movie that hasn’t been released yet? Columbo wouldn’t have an
association with the music because he’s never heard it before.” I enjoy a good
“imagine a scene playing out to this music” thought exercise, but it would have
been out of place at the best of times, and just feels like Admiral Plot Device
was involved in this particular case.
Yet for all that…I don’t hate the episode. While it seems
more interested in discussing music than solving the mystery, Falk and Connolly
have a great rapport and seem to be enjoying each other’s company. It makes the
episode pass quickly, and it honestly has much more energy and verve than a lot
of better scripted, tighter paced episodes from this period. In fact, if you
asked me to rank the episodes from this “season”, I’d probably put this one
higher than things like “Caution: Murder can be Hazardous to Your Health” or
“Death Hits the Jackpot”. Those two are more competently executed, but this one
is more entertaining. Something can be technically flawless and still not have
much soul, after all, and I think that’s what happened here. So despite the
slight story, I wouldn’t say you should avoid it. It’s never going to be one of
the greats, but if you just want to watch something fairly relaxing and light,
this episode’s got you covered.
Number of
“Columbo-isms”: 4/6. There’s one close enough example of “Just one more
thing” (though it’s not said to the murderer), a big scene involving Columbo’s
car, and several mentions of his wife. And after spending nearly an entire
episode about music without it coming up, “This Old Man” finally makes an
appearance at the very end of the story, both in and out of universe. I’m a
little relieved, to be honest; missing that opportunity would have meant
someone dropped the ball.
Other: *This
is one of the few episodes where there’s a recurring character besides Columbo.
Columbo’s partner on this case is Sergeant Degarmo (Richard Riehle), who was
also helping him out in “Ashes to Ashes”, the previous episode. Given that
there was at least a two year gap between episodes, that’s some pretty
impressive continuity.
*I think we can definitively say that Columbo got over
his fear of heights sometime between 1978 and 1989. Not only does he seem
perfectly comfortable looking over the edge of the roof where McEnery died, but
Degarmo acts as if Columbo’s standing a little too close to the edge, while
Columbo seems completely unperturbed. I’m not sure what technique he used to
get over it, but good for him for taking the effort to beat it. Besides, I’d
rather think he overcame it himself rather than accuse the writers of being
lazy and forgetting an established aspect of the character.
*For the first time in…ever, Columbo carries his cigars
in a little tin instead of just having them hanging around loose in his coat. This
is weird enough on its own, but I can’t help but notice that the tin looks
uncannily like an Altoids tin. It’s not in the shot long enough for me to think
it was product placement, and maybe it actually is meant for cigars, but it’s definitely a curious beat. Though if
it is an Altoids tin, I would
absolutely believe that Columbo would repurpose it for that use.
*During one of the padding scenes where Columbo is
guiding Crawford home, Crawford has his media system on in his car. I’m not
positive if he’s listening to a CD, listening to one radio station and turning
up the volume, or switching between radio stations, but whichever one it is,
I’m a little puzzled by the music choices. Sure, they’re funny out-of-universe,
but in what universe would you ever expect to hear “Brahms’s Lullaby” and
“Turkey in the Straw” one right after the other? For that matter, what radio
station would be playing “Turkey in the Straw” in the middle of the night
anyway?
*This episode has quite a few movie references scattered
through it, some obvious, some oblique. Not only do we get yet another
Spielberg reference with the theme from Jaws,
but I highly suspect we’re supposed to see Crawford as a stand in for John
Williams, and the story Columbo is told about a director who got too big for
his britches and wound up being reduced to directing a television sitcom seems
just specific enough that I feel like it’s referencing someone, though I’m not entirely sure who. If anybody’s got any
idea, feel free to share.
Would This Hold Up
in Court?: Maybe. It’s a pretty weak case, all things considered. Columbo
has no solid proof for Crawford’s motive, and the one big piece of evidence he
has can’t definitively be tied to Crawford either, at least not that we saw.
Based solely on what we’re given in this episode, therefore, I’m going to say
no. There might be other material that would add up to a case, but we’re not
privy to it. One more reason that all that padding wasn’t the greatest idea.
No comments:
Post a Comment