Show: Columbo
Episode
Particulars: S9EP1, “Murder: A Self Portrait”, original airdate November 25th,
1989.
Standalone
Thoughts: I enjoyed this episode, but I’ll also admit that I have biases
that make me predisposed to it. No, it doesn’t have anything to do with movies
this time; it’s discussions of dreams and dream interpretations. I’ve always
had a soft spot for things like that (you can imagine how happy Inception made me), so having it take up
a large part of the episode was a good thing for me. All that being said, I am
very well aware that some of the interpretations that Columbo and Barsini are
coming up with are kind of stupid and only work because Admiral Plot Device
says so. Furthermore, the dream sequences themselves are artsy in a way that
would drive other people crazy, the way the camera tricks in “Ransom For a Dead
Man” drove me nuts. So while I personally like this episode, I might not
recommend it for everybody.
I also wouldn’t necessarily recommend the episode for
everybody because the relationship between Barsini and the women in his life
might be uncomfortable for some people. At the beginning, there was a certain
comedic charm to it; I could easily see those early scenes being part of a
sweet movie revolving around a man and his ex-wives who somehow all get along.
But very quickly, Barsini turns into a tyrant who doesn’t actually care about
what the women want as long as he’s happy. It never quite tips over into creepy
territory—Bauchau has just enough charisma to keep things relatively light—but
there’s enough of a focus on how he treats his “girls” that he becomes a nasty
character pretty fast. In fact, he’s probably number three on my list of “most
awful Columbo murderers”, right
behind Doctor Mayfield and Marcus Collier. Which means he made an impression,
but it’s not exactly the proudest of distinctions.
Despite those issues, though, I still stand by my
statement that I enjoyed the episode. The tone and settings for the episode
made it feel like it could have been in one of the earlier Columbo seasons, the acting is generally good, and while I’ve
established that the material isn’t for everyone, it works if you’re willing to
meet it halfway. As with the three prior seasons, Season Nine is giving us a
promising start. Whether or not it will maintain that quality remains to be
seen.
Number of
“Columbo-isms”: Once again, we manage a perfect 6/6. Dog gets a big scene,
the car pops up sporadically, Mrs. Columbo gets mentioned a few times, you can
hear “This Old Man” on the soundtrack, Columbo does quite a bit of fumbling,
and while he never actively says “Just one more thing”, he does the “leave and
come back” gambit, which is close enough. I’m not sure why we keep getting so
many perfect scores now, but I’m certainly not complaining.
Other: *While
the opening scene involving Columbo and Dog at a Basset Hound show ultimately
serves no purpose, I’m more forgiving of it than I am of the scene that opened
“Make Me a Perfect Murder”. This is because a) it at least has a bit of payoff
later that proves to have a tenuous connection to the case, and b) because it’s
cute. As with many things, putting cute animals in a scene can make up for
other weaknesses.
*Speaking of the opening scene, there’s a moment where a
Basset Hound gets on a picnic table and starts licking a tray of meat before
being picked up by his owner. It’s just an establishing scene and meant to be a
funny beat, but the germaphobe in me sincerely hopes they got rid of the meat,
or, perhaps appropriately, gave it to the dogs.
*Some behind the scenes trivia for you; Peter Falk met
his second wife, Shera Danese, when she worked on Columbo. In fact, she appeared in six different Columbo episodes, the first one being
“Fade in to Murder” (bonus trivia; that was the only episode she did before she
was married to Falk). I probably should have brought this up earlier (particularly
“Murder Under Glass” where she had a fairly large role), but this was the first
time I saw her name in the opening credits, so it’s only now that the thought
occurred to me.
*I was originally kind of baffled by the fact that Julie
was reacting so well to the things Barsini was saying to her in their first
scene, because he kept saying things like “worthless slut”, “rather stupid”,
and “you have no detectable soul”. Then I realized what a warped relationship
he had with the women in his life, and it all made sense. It’s still kind of
disturbing how laissez-faire she was
about it, though.
*There’s a nighttime establishing shot where we see the
moon. It’s a nice enough shot, but as with the nighttime shot from Poirot’s “Problem at Sea”, it doesn’t
look very realistic. That being said, I’ve seen the moon look pretty huge at
times, so what do I know?
*I’ll give the episode credit; after at least two
episodes revolving around doctors having relationships with their patients,
this episode actually acknowledges that this is a bad thing, and tries to set
it up so that Doctor Hammer is doing everything above board, from his
relationship with Louise to giving evidence to the police. It’s not too
important of the grand scheme of things, but I like that they were willing to
address it.
*Speaking of therapy, there’s a moment where Hammer lies
down on the couch in his office, needing some rest, while Columbo sits in the
nearby chair as the two of them discuss the case. Inevitably, it starts to look
and feel like Columbo’s the one analyzing Hammer instead of the other way
around. It’s an obvious joke, but Falk and Coe make it work, so if I rolled my
eyes, it was in an affectionate way.
*After vanishing from his pockets post-“Swan Song”,
Columbo’s tape recorder makes a triumphant return. Granted, a quick check of
its various appearances reveals that its design has changed each time, but it’s
still a form of continuity.
Would This Hold Up
in Court?: It’s not the strongest case Columbo’s ever had, but I’d say yes,
assuming he obtained his key piece of evidence legally. Knowing Columbo,
though, that’s a pretty big if.
No comments:
Post a Comment