Show: Columbo
Episode
Particulars: S1EP4, “Suitable for Framing”, original airdate November 17th,
1971.
Standalone Thoughts:
For most of the runtime, this episode is fine but nothing too exciting. There
are good bits of business, but it’s basically about what you’d expect; Columbo
starts pointing out inconsistencies and Kingston deflects them, growing
increasingly exasperated. But then the time comes to read the will, and
suddenly everything changes. What we thought
was the motive gets called into question, and we’re thrown off balance,
unsure how this is all going to play out. That leads to some moments of
suspense (a scene between Columbo and Kingston at Kingston’s apartment
immediately springs to mind), pieces of evidence that aren’t as important as
they first appeared, and a few semi-twists that just make things even more
intriguing. About the only weakness is that Kingston’s ultimate plan can be a
bit confusing, but you get the gist of it eventually, and the payoff is very
satisfying. It shook up the formula in a good way (as opposed to the previous
episode), and actually kind of felt like a proper mystery, which is an unexpected
but not unwelcome development. I wouldn’t want it all the time—that’s not what Columbo is about—but having a classic
mystery feel every now and then is just fine by me.
Number of
“Columbo-isms”: 3/6, but some of them cut it close. There’s definitely
instances of “Just one more thing”, and there’s one mention of his wife and the
appearance of his car, but those last two come pretty late in the game. Also,
while Columbo does fumble around in his coat a bit, it’s not at the level I’m
used to, so I don’t feel like I can include it. Opinions may vary on that one,
though.
Other: *The
episode didn’t leave the greatest first impression when the camera kept zooming
in on the various pieces of art as Kingston prepared the murder scene, complete
with dramatic stings on the soundtrack. Doing it when he first shot his uncle
was all right, but to continue doing it smacked of pretension. Fortunately,
things calmed down considerably after that, so we weren’t faced with another
distracting “Ransom for a Dead Man” situation. No, I’m not entirely sure when
I’m going to shut up about this either.
*I’m not going to take a screencap of it, but the jacket
Kingston wears in the first part of the episode is very, very 70’s. It initially didn’t look bad at a distance, but close
up…yikes. Combine that with a frilly shirt and I start to wonder if Mike Meyers
didn’t see that outfit and decide to base his Austin Powers ensemble around it.
*Classical music fans may get a bit of a smile out of the
fact that the music playing in the background during the party at the art
gallery is a jazzy version of Modest Mussorgsky’s “Pictures at an Exhibition”.
Yeah, it’s a bit pretentious, but it’s also subtle, and I appreciate touches
like that when it’s not in your face.
*I know Columbo likes to pretend he’s a bumbler, but I
feel like he should have respected the wishes of the servants and refrained
from lighting up his cigar in the hall after being asked not to. That makes him
look thoughtless in a way that I’m not entirely sure was intended.
*I really like the brief scene where Columbo interviews a
painter and gets flustered by the fact that there’s a naked woman in the room.
It’s both funny and oddly endearing. Maybe it’s because it shows that Columbo’s
a modest kind of guy, and I like guys like that.
*When Columbo is trying to get some information out of
Tracy’s landlady (Mary Wickes), he first has to sit through her going through
her photo albums and gushing over some of the pictures inside. Given that one
of Columbo’s methods of fishing for information/distracting a suspect is to
blather about his family, I would have been amused if Columbo showed some
self-awareness that he was having to deal with an annoyance he dishes out on a
regular basis. However, it appears that everyone was playing this scene
straight, which is fine too.
Would This Hold Up
in Court?: While the way Columbo catches Kingston would skirt dangerously
close to subverting “Playing Fair” if I was using the Poirot tropes, it’s a clever trick that I do think would hold up in
court. It is, however, amusing to note that Kingston calls it entrapment when,
for once, it isn’t.
No comments:
Post a Comment