Show: Columbo
Episode
Particulars: S3EP4, “Double Exposure”, original airdate December 16th,
1973.
Standalone
Thoughts: I found this episode interesting, although I’m probably biased in
that regard. Much like “Requiem for a Falling Star”, the episode has a lot to
do with film (sometimes literally), and so it’s got my attention almost
immediately. There’s also the added bonus of the fact that they don’t make or
run movies in the same way nowadays, so we get the time capsule effect, which
is always fun for people who like history. If you’re just in it for the story,
you’ll probably enjoy it too. However…
The episode is so excited to focus on the subliminal
messaging and the interactions between Kepple and Columbo that it feels like a
lot of relevant material got shoved to the sidelines. Kepple’s entire motive
for murdering Norris was because Norris was (I think) being set up to be
blackmailed by being caught in a compromising position with a lady Kepple used
for his advertisements. Norris also intimates that Kepple has done this before.
But once the motive is established and the deed done, that entire thing mostly
falls by the wayside. Columbo talks to Mrs. Norris (Louise Latham) once, and
then that whole aspect isn’t really brought up again until near the end. In
fact, the lady in question never even appears on screen, which isn’t
necessarily a bad thing (after all, they do it in every episode with Mrs.
Columbo), but it does make you realize that things that should be important are kind of being ignored.
But I forgive a lot of that, because the episode also
contains something I didn’t (appropriately enough) consciously realize I liked
until right now. Namely, Columbo and Kepple have a conversation where Columbo
knows Kepple’s the murderer and Kepple knows he knows, but the two of them
dance around the subject, both confident that they can beat the other
eventually. Most of the time, Columbo just makes vague innuendos, and if he’s
confronted by the murderer, it’s generally an angry “stop accusing me or I’ll
report you to your superiors”. I don’t think we’ve seen something like this
since the original pilot, and I’d forgotten how enjoyable that sort of knowing
subtlety can be to watch. Then again, given my love for both Garak and Weyoun
over on Deep Space Nine, I shouldn’t
be surprised that I’d respond so well to it.
While it’s still not as strong as other episodes have
been, this is the strongest episode of the season so far, although I’ll freely
admit that these could be my biases talking. It’s got good acting and good
writing, and even if it ignored some elements, what we do get is worth
watching. It may be a bit flawed, but it’s not irreversibly so.
Number of
“Columbo-isms”: 2/6 for sure, and two maybes. There’s definitely several
mentions of his wife and a very clear-cut “Just one more thing”, but he doesn’t
do a lot of fumbling, and while we get a brief glimpse of him behind the wheel
of a car, the shot is tight enough that we can’t be entirely positive that it is his car. That being said, he does
drive a golf cart at one point, so that kind of makes up for it.
Other: *It’s
not worth taking a screencap of, but one of the characters is wearing a tie that
is the exact color and pattern as her shirt. To each their own, of course, but
that seems like an odd fashion choice to me.
*During one conversation, Kepple talks to Columbo about
body language in a way that made it sound like reading body language was this
brand new concept, which I absolutely refuse to accept. The only other
explanation is that Kepple’s talking to Columbo assuming he’s an idiot, which makes
some sense but didn’t feel like the case in this instance. I don’t mind them
having the conversation, but I think that one line needed to be tweaked a bit.
Would This Hold Up
in Court?: Despite the fact that they caught Kepple red-handed, no. When
the guy Columbo gets to help him out points out that they need a search
warrant, Columbo says “I’m not searching, I’m looking.” It makes sense in
context, but I’m pretty sure a lawyer could convince a jury that it was searching without a warrant. Also, if
the technique he used to catch Kepple was banned in innocuous settings, I
refuse to believe it would be accepted as hard evidence. It’s a clever trick
and very entertaining to watch, but the prosecuting attorney assigned to the
case would not be amused. Again.
No comments:
Post a Comment