Show: Columbo
Episode
Particulars: S3EP5, “Publish or Perish”, original airdate January 13th,
1974.
Standalone
Thoughts: This episode has one hell of a hook. People have framed other
people for murder, or made it look like they were the intended victim, but this
is the first time someone has framed themselves. It’s a clever idea and is well
executed (both in and out of universe), and returns the show to form after
mostly being “meh” all season. About the only complaints I can make are that
some of the moments required to make things work are just a little “Admiral
Plot Device”, and there’s one piece of evidence that is kind of set up but
mostly comes out of nowhere (and thus would fail my “Playing Fair” requirements
if I was still doing that). Overall, though, it’s well done, and there’s really
not much more I can say than that.
Number of
“Columbo-isms”: 4/6. There’s a glimpse of the car, a mention of Mrs.
Columbo, a very definite “Just one more thing” even if he doesn’t say those
exact words, and while he doesn’t do too much fumbling in his coat, he does ask
to borrow a pencil, which I’d say is close enough for government work.
Other: *I am
amused that the two times so far that Jack Cassidy has played a murderer, it’s
had to do with writing (first as an author, now as a publisher). I’d almost say
he was being typecast.
*After a pretty long stretch where the cameramen were
behaving themselves, this episode decided to get all fancy and distracting
again. It literally starts with a bang as Kane tests some of his bombs, and
each explosion is accompanied by a freeze frame and some credits. This is a
little goofy, but not too bad. Then, later on, it uses a technique that’s less
split-screen and more “picture in picture” to show three things happening at
once, which means that the audience isn’t entirely sure where to look. That’s
the most egregious use, but I also think the camera lingers for too long on a
shot of the key as Columbo and Greenleaf pass it back and forth across the
table. It’s probably meant to create tension, but it just feels a bit silly. Guys,
the story’s got an interesting enough hook; you didn’t need to play around with
the camera to hold our attention.
*I wonder why Kane is writing a book about how to make
and safely detonate bombs instead of, I don’t know, bringing his ideas to the
military or the government? Is he supposed to be disillusioned with them after
serving in Vietnam? Because as it stands, he’d probably get in big trouble if
he actually tried to publish this book. Maybe I’m coming at this from the 2017
perspective, when things like this would immediately be jumped on by both the
government and the media, but I feel like a book that is literally titled “How
to Blow Up Everything in Ten Easy Steps” would still make people nervous in
1974. But I wasn’t there, so I’m not going to speak for anybody on that matter.
*The car accident Greenleaf stages to set up his alibi is
interesting to me for one very strange reason; the car he crashes into is a
beat up Volkswagen van, and one of the passengers in the van is a woman in a
fur stole. That’s probably the most unlikely pairing of vehicle and passenger
I’ve seen in a while, and I kind of want to know the story behind it. Alas, no
such luck.
*One of the books Greenleaf appears to have published is
a book called “My Home was a House”. I’m just curious as to what the hell that
even means, and what the novel could
be about. Maybe it’s a very strange horror story…
*At one point, Columbo interrupts Greenleaf while he’s
watching something, but we never find out what he’s watching. There’s a tiny
part of me that wonders if it was supposed to be a dirty movie, but then I
wonder why he was watching it openly in what appears to be a private theater in
his office. I’m not entirely sure what else it could be, though.
*This episode contains a surprising bit of continuity.
Columbo mentions the events of “Candidate for Crime”, and says he’s thinking of
writing a book on the subject. It plays out about the same way it does in the Poirot episode “The Million Dollar Bond
Robbery”, in that both longtime fans and casual viewers will enjoy the
discussion about it, albeit for very different reasons. Well, if it worked in
one, it’ll definitely work in the other.
Would This Hold Up
in Court?: Mostly, yes. Columbo’s got relatively solid evidence and a
witness of sorts to back up his case. The only stumbling block is whether or
not he can come up with a good reason for changing some locks, otherwise that
could come across as a sort of entrapment. On the whole, though, this is one of
the more evidence laden convictions, which is good because Greenleaf has a
lawyer who will be very quick to jump on some of the discrepancies. Though
Columbo will no doubt find a way to deal with him too.
No comments:
Post a Comment