Show: Columbo
Episode
Particulars: S3EP3, “Candidate for Crime”, original airdate November 4th,
1973.
Standalone
Thoughts: This episode starts out with a really interesting idea…and then
kind of squanders it. It’s established right from the beginning that Stone set
up the death threats against Hayward to boost his ratings in the polls, and if
the entire episode had revolved around him and Hayward making it look like
there were repeated attempts on his life, that would have been another good
example of shaking up the Columbo formula.
But they decided to go with a more traditional murder, which is a bit
disappointing but not too bad. My bigger problem is that they don’t seem to
know what they’re doing with the traditional murder, either.
Again, there were two interesting directions the episode
could have gone once they decided to have Hayward murder Stone. First, he could
have been doing it to further his political ambitions, killing two birds with
one stone by making it look like a case of mistaken identity while also getting
rid of the guy who knows his biggest secrets. Instead, the episode makes it
seem like Hayward did it because he’s tired of Stone interfering with his love
life. If that was the case, he should have used it to his advantage; once he
killed Stone, he then should have found a way to do something similar with his
wife, again insisting that the bullet was meant for him. It would have tied
everything together nicely, since he gets even more sympathy, the way is clear for him to get the girl, and the
person who most vehemently opposed the relationship is dead. But once Stone is
shot…his relationship with Miss Johnson is pretty much relegated to the
background. He finds a few reasons to see her, Victoria makes a few snarky
comments, and Columbo appears to have figured out that Johnson is attracted to
him. Other than that, she’s unimportant to the case. If she was the primary
motive, you’d think she’d have a bigger part to play. And if she wasn’t the primary motive, then I’m not
entirely sure what was.
Furthermore, the episode feels like there’s a lot of
padding. Columbo does his usual thing of talking about innocuous but actually
important things, yet some of those lines of inquiry don’t really seem all that
relevant, even to the audience. They also go on long enough that instead of
being amused by Columbo’s methods, they run the risk of making the audience as
annoyed as the in-universe listener. Then the episode takes it a step further
by having a very long segment that revolves around Columbo’s car, first when
he’s stopped by traffic cops, then when he’s having the car repaired based on
what the traffic cops saw. There’s even an interlude where he drives a tow
truck and uses it to test a theory. Granted, this all winds up going somewhere
and it makes perfect sense once Columbo explains it, but it feels like a lot of
work for a minor payoff.
I’d say this is one of the weaker Columbo episodes, though it’s not quite as weak as “Lovely but
Lethal” or “The Most Crucial Game”. Once we know what Columbo’s looking for,
the material is good, and Cooper’s performance is excellent. The episode just
feels more convoluted and bloated than it needed to be. This one might have
benefited from being 75 minutes instead of 100 minutes; less time can mean more
streamlined. But Hollywood’s been making things overlong for years, so I
shouldn’t be surprised that TV gets in on the act as well.
Number of
“Columbo-isms”: Another 5/6. Columbo’s wife is used as an excuse to get
more information, the car plays a large role as I mentioned before, Columbo
fumbles in his coat for practically everything, and “This old man” is sung or
whistled twice. But the big winner is “Just one more thing” which shows up a
whopping four times in the course of one conversation. I think that may be a
record. I have to applaud Columbo for managing to keep it up for so long.
Other: *This
episode once again shakes things up a bit by having Columbo appear in the first
two minutes. It’s just a brief glimpse as Hayward is giving an interview in the
police station, but it’s always interesting when the show deviates from the
formula, no matter how big or small.
*There’s an (in theory) neat camera trick where the
camera zooms out from the scene that’s supposedly taking place in real time to
reveal that it’s being broadcast on TV. In practice, though, something feels
off about it, and I’m not sure exactly what it is. Maybe it’s the fact that the
scene doesn’t quite fit the TV screen. Whatever it is, it was probably due to
the limitations of special effects in 1973, so while I’ll notice it, I won’t
hold it against the episode.
*After my discussion about the odd “A” shirt Nora
Chandler was wearing in “Requiem for a Falling Star”, I feel like I should
mention that Miss Johnson wears a shirt in one scene that’s also covered with
A’s. I now must conclude that the A is, in fact, a designer’s logo. But it must
be out of business now, because I’ve never seen it here in 2017. Anyone who
knows more about fashion than I do can feel free to chime in.
Would This Hold Up
in Court?: This one’s a definite yes. Columbo has hard evidence and doesn’t
even have to worry about not having a warrant for once. Given how much publicity
this case is going to get, he played things very well this time around.
No comments:
Post a Comment